This is a topical point, in my head, sometimes when I am popping. I have neither read the whole article nor plan to read the book. I just feel the topic is off putting for me. And it's me. People are welcome to go ahead and read. For me, it's like a Dhiraj Rai song. People listen to it. Some might even like it.

I am precisely interested in your comment about the quality of critique in Op Eds and news magazines in Nepal. I rote learned a bunch of "biwechanatmak" answers to pass Nepali in SLC. I never learned the art of reading a good critique. The only standard I percolated was by reading NY Times or The Atlantic and Maria Popova's Brain Pickings. So I gave up on Nepali critique. Not having an age old or established humanities, liberal arts curriculum in South Asian education system is reflective even in more established giants like the Hindu and Times of India. I bias this opinion by reading many Quora praises for everything related to IIT and a Shahrukh Khan's Ted talk (which was OK, and not godly, as commented by 90% Indian Youtubers). So man, I don't know. That critique does sound pretty lame. Pretty pretty lame.

दुवै हो ,

अलिकति केहि मिल्न पाएको हुन्न लौ यो येही बाट सुरु भएको हो भन्ने हरु धेरै छन् संसार मा . दुवै को श्रोत त्यो भन्दा अगाडी को हुन सक्छ र दुवै मा तेस्को केहि समानता देखिएको पनि हुन सक्छ भन्ने सम्म सोच्दैनन् मान्छे हरु .

एस्तो प्रबृत्ति सबै धर्म मा छ, सबै देश हरुमा छ र कहिले कही यो एक तथाकथित गौरब कायम राख्न पनि गरिन्छ.
साएद संसार आफु वोरी परि नै घुम्छ भन्ने मानसिकता ले धेरै लै मानसिक संतुस्ती दिन्छ होला

Let's stop making "others are doing too..." argument.

That was not argument, I was mentioning the fact I observed. Why hide from the fact? fact wont disappear.

As long as you're not making the case to justify it, that's fine.