|
[VIEWED 5696
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
observer
Please log in to subscribe to observer's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 12:43
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
SaveEarth
Please log in to subscribe to SaveEarth's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 8:09
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Awesome stuff dude, thanks for sharing it!
|
| |
|
|
TilKumari_Ko_Poi
Please log in to subscribe to TilKumari_Ko_Poi's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 11:40
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
TilKumari_Ko_Poi
Please log in to subscribe to TilKumari_Ko_Poi's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 11:40
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
JagaltayBhoot
Please log in to subscribe to JagaltayBhoot's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 12:33
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
The first breaking news is pretty interesting. But has anyone confirmed the authenticity of the site/ link? cheers
|
| |
|
|
Kiddo
Please log in to subscribe to Kiddo's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 1:09
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Ya guys trippin. This ain't Breaking news. The speculation was brought forth about a week after the incident. There already were plenty of links to advocate the conspiracy theory of a plane not being involved in the accident, nothing new. The reason there are no traces of plane is coz it was filled with burning gas. Other planes in the presentation might not be so much filled. Did they recover traces of plane in WTC?
|
| |
|
|
solver
Please log in to subscribe to solver's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 1:16
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Yadav
Please log in to subscribe to Yadav's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 4:07
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
I am sure they did record traces of planes that struck WTC. Even if they didn't...we know for fact that they were planes coz the event was captured on cameras. The speculation of a missile striking Pentagon exists because it wasn't caught on tape.
|
| |
|
|
Kiddo
Please log in to subscribe to Kiddo's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 5:53
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Conspiracy theories have two strong points 1. Questionable circumstances. Like so called conspiracy behind first men walking in the moon. 2. Basis for the conspiracy. In above case, USA just did it to outsmart USSR. Well, in this case, there really isn't much basis for the 'conspiracy.' Why would Al-Qaeda hide the fact that missile was involved. Besides accepting the fact that stupid weapons like loaded airplane has already been used, why would US hide the missile part? Now, point behind my WTC accident was not to say that it might also be a conspiracy (and you say they had videotaped the event, who is questioning that?), but to identify the fact that no traces of planes were found there either. AND MY BIGGEST POINT IS THIS IS 2-3 YEARS OLD NEWS!!! Not a breaking freaknig news.
|
| |
|
|
copy cat
Please log in to subscribe to copy cat's postings.
Posted on 08-28-04 7:44
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
hey observer, nice observation man !! "kudos" Though it was long-time-coming, it was INTERSTING nevertheless. never really thought it that way......actually didn't have time to care !! Good one, man, thnx for sharing ! and TKP, ohowwww, man !! that video was real HARDENING to watch. (if u know what i mean ;->) thnx for sharing, dude. it was unexpected, tara warning lekhnu paryo ni. nearly watched it with my small bro !
|
| |
