Maoists to shun private property



BY GHANASHYAM OJHA


KATHMANDU, Jan 30 - In a drive to create a communist 'commune', the CPN-Maoist has initiated collecting details of individual property of its leaders and cadres to transfer them in the name of the party.
The party has formed a monitoring committee under the coordination of Mohan Baidhya aka Kiran, a senior Maoist leader, to prepare the details of individual property.

"The committee will soon discuss the modalities of collecting details of the private property of Maoist comrades before transferring them in the name of the party," said Kiran.

He also said the decision was taken on the basis that the Maoists always fought against the concept of retaining private property. "We want to form a proletarian society," he said.

Although the Maoist had decided against holding private property through its National Conference in 2001 and had formed a committee under the coordination of Haribhakta Kandel in 2004, it could not complete the task

"The Kandel-committee had begun collecting details of individual property of all leaders and cadres. But it couldn't complete the task, as we were at war," said Dina Nath Sharma, Maoist central leader and recently selected lawmaker.

Sharma, who claims to have already submitted his private property to the party, said the communists are by nature proletarian. "If we hold private property, how can we remain different from other capitalist parties," Sharma said.

He also said Maoist leaders and cadres shouldn't claim individual property and they are not supposed to have their individual expectations besides the party. "They must accept what the party decides for them," Sharma said. "It is the real commitment of a communist toward the party."

He also said Maoist senior leaders Prachanda, Dr Baburam Bhattarai, Krishna Bahadur Mahara and some other central leaders have already submitted their private property to the party.

"Party cadres have occupied our houses and they will begin cultivating the land also," Sharma said. "Until now, our cadres were not able to cultivate our land due to security reasons."

Kiran-committee, a very powerful committee, has also been authorized to formulate provisions in policing the party. "My committee formulates policies to purify the party," Kiran said. "The collection of private property is also a part of the purification process."

Besides preparing details of individual property, the committee will also formulate necessary rules and regulations to keep the party and its cadres well-disciplined.

"We stress on discipline and we expect our party, its leaders and cadres to always maintain discipline and be committed to the party," he said.

Kiran-committee is expected to complete the task of collecting details of individual property of its leaders and cadres in a month. "We will first begin from the central leaders and will gradually go down to the local levels," Kiran said.

As part of sensitizing the party cadres regarding the party's decision on individual property and a gamut of other decisions, the party recently organized a four-day training session for its nation-wide cadres in Chitwan some two weeks ago. "We are sensitizing our cadres regarding our decision," said Sharma.

The Maoist decision against holding individual property was also reflected in the party's ruling to all its lawmakers. The party has ruled that its lawmakers can't possess the money, received under the Parliamentary Act related to facilities and perks to parliamentarians. The party has taken responsibility of managing the expenses of its lawmakers

h1b it's not going to be funny when they come to your house and transfer ownership to their party.

माओवादिको अन्त उनिहरुकै बकम्फुसे नितिले गर्छ,अरुले केहि गर्नु पर्दैन।अझै जङ्गलि नै छन इनिहरु।

Now they have found the other way to capture janata's money and property.

Last time i had commented to the similar thread in sajha. I am writing it here again. It is true and taken from the book "The Road to war".



This is an excerpt from the book "The Road to War" by Richard overy and andrew wheatcroft.
This paragraph, taken from the page #194,shows how people's tradition and their lives and livelihood were changed drastically by the Russian Premier Stalin.

'The Question is would the general people of Nepal give his land and his livelihood for the collectivisation??? ' WOULD YOU???

"The second line of attack was on the countryside. In Junuary 1930 Stalin launched the major campaign to collectivise Soviet agriculture, to end the centuries-old system of strip and patch farming with horses and handpower, and to substitute large, rationalised, state-owned farms, with tractor and mechanical reaper. The enterprise was a vast one. Collectivisation confronted the great bulk of the Soviet population with a bleak chice: to abandon the land so hardly won in 1917, and the habits formed from centuries of depredation and hardship, or to stand, bewildered and vulnerable, against the revolutionary storm that broke over them. For some of the peasantry ther was no chice. Stalin had already identified a specific enemy of the revolution in the countryside, the Kuluk, the rich farmer who threatened to bring in capitalism by the rural back door. The kulak (in Russian meaning "fist"- someone who holds on to what he wants) was neither righ by western standards, nor very politically conscious,m nor very numerious. But he was made to stand for the forces of reaction, responsible for backwardness, for wreaking revolutionary prospects. Between 1930 and 1933 an army of Soviet officials and policemen, urged on by the ascendant radicals in the cities, descended on the villages, arresting and deporting anyonewho was deemed to be a kulak. In effect this meant anyonewho resisted the collective farm. Millions fo peasants did do so. They fled to the towns, slaughtered thier livestock, burned thir stocks. A new civil war raged over the Soviet plains as communists exacted a bitter revenge on those who were holding up progress and socialism. It was a messy, almost planless, confrontation, trading on denuncation and envy, investing in ambition and violence. Peasants already forced in collectives turned against those still outside, cut thir teeth on a further round of deportations and excutions. In the three years the Soviet landscape was transformed. Almost all the land area ws collecitivised; millions of peasants died of starvation or in the labour camps sit up for deportees. the industrial proletariat grew from three million to ten milion in seven years as dispossessed young farmers were sent to build the industries of the new industrial cities, Magnitogorsk, Stalingrad, Lugansk."

माओबादीको नेता बनेर सञ्च राजनीति गरौला, टन्न लुटौला र सात पुस्तालाई कमाउँला भनेको त उल्टो आफ्नो सम्पति पनि पार्टीले लैजाने पो भो। म चाहिं प्रवेश नगर्ने भएँ यो पार्टीमा। राप्रपा तिर हानिनु पर्ला, पशुपतिब्रो मरेपछि सबै सम्पति पार्टीलाई दिने रे भन्ने सुनेको छु, सत्र परिहाल्छ कि:)

Just joke hai. I don't care any party politics, but this news was funny.

Natak garchaan chor salle haru..tesko bau ko ke nai thiyo hola ra tesle party lai dincha.
Nepali haru ko samati lootni upaya ho.

Bhaako sampati pani eni haru lai deu ani bholi chor haru bhage pachhi ta bho ,kun rajya le paalne???hahaha..

Ho sabai bhanda pahile ..bidesh ma basi maobadi lai samarthan ganre haru le maobadi party lai sampati dinu paryo.Aba sajah ko maobadi haru ko naam naleeu ..hahaha

मेरो तुच्छ बिचारमा त नेताहरुले मोज गर्न गरेको आइडिया हो। सबैलाई 'ल्याओ तिमेर्को सम्पति, के लाई राख्छौ, एक बारको मरिजाने चोलामा, बरु मैले राम्रो सँग खर्च गरिदिम्ला, खान लाउन पनी दिम्ला' भन्यो। अनि भको सम्पति सबै बुझाए पछि बुढो बाउआमालाई अनैतिक छोराहरुले हपार्‍या जस्तै 'काम साम गर्ने हैन अहिले खान आँ गर्न लाज लाग्दैन?' भनेर दिनदिनै सासना दियो। हैरान भएर सम्पतै छोडेर आफै भाग्छन कार्यकर्ता हरु? जे होस, मोज गर्ने भए नेताहरुले।मानेँ कामरेडहरुको आइडियालाई।

म चाहिँ pire जिको पन्खा नै भए।कति राम्रो प्रस्तुति।अनि ImI जिलाइ चाहि बामेहरुको नाम सुन्यो कि पारा छुड्दो र छ।नछुटोस पनि कसरि पुङ्ग् न पुच्छरको कुरा गर्छन् खालि।